Skip to main content

CPG

Scout Delivered ~31% Effort Savings in Project Assurance for a Global Consumer Goods Leader

Group 11003@2x

The Challenge

A leading global consumer goods company sought greater visibility into how project governance work was executed across its Project Assurance teams. Despite having strong frameworks in place, teams struggled with hidden inefficiencies, rework from incorrect submissions, and fragmented workflows across tools.

Each team member supported over 150 project managers globally, making it critical to reduce effort leakage, improve submission quality, and streamline validation processes without compromising governance rigor.
Industry

Consumer Goods

Function

Project Assurance

Geographies

India, Mexico & Ireland

Timeline

4 Weeks

Objectives

The initiative focused on:

Identifying manual effort hotspots across project submissions and validations
Reducing rework caused by incomplete or incorrect submissions
Streamlining governance checks performed within the project management platform
Pinpointing application switching and standardization opportunities

Enter

Group 6298

To address these challenges, the organization deployed Scout across teams in India, Mexico, and Ireland.

Scout captured interaction data across systems and workflows to provide a clear, data-driven view of how work was actually being performed—highlighting inefficiencies, effort hotspots, and opportunities for automation and standardization.

Group

Scout Insights

Rework from First Time Not Right (FTNR) Submissions

Scout found that 25% of team capacity was tied up managing FTNR submissions. Of this:

7%

of total effort was spent reworking incorrect submissions

18%

of effort went into clarifying expectations with project managers through collaboration tools, often due to knowledge gaps

Group 10984

Manual Validations in the Project Management Platform

Scout uncovered that 6% of total effort was dedicated to manual rule checking and validations within the project management system. These checks were largely driven by fragmented Excel trackers and lacked automation support.

Group 10986

Application Switching and Data Fragmentation

Teams spent 29% of total effort toggling between the project management system and Excel to validate and update project data. This highlighted inefficiencies caused by inconsistent documentation formats and disconnected tools.

Scout Recommendations

Group 10976

Improve FTNR Quality

Launch targeted enablement programs for project managers through structured playbooks, reference guides, and training to reduce clarification cycles.

Group 10994

Automate Governance Validations

Embed rule-based validations and standardize project trackers to streamline checks and ensure governance compliance.

Group 10990

Reduce Application Toggling

Align system and spreadsheet usage through consolidated templates and eliminate duplicative updates through automation.

Potential Business Impact

By implementing Scout’s data-backed recommendations, the Project Assurance team is positioned to:

Unlock ~31% effort savings across validation and rework activities

Group 11008
Improve governance throughput without compromising rigor
Group 11009
Build consistent, scalable workflows across global teams
Group 11011

See Scout in action.
Schedule your demo now!

Request demo
Secret Link
By Submitting you agree to our Terms of Services and Privacy Policy